26. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. at 206, we lawfully may presume that McCleskey's death sentence was not "wantonly and freakishly" imposed, id. For more information, to subscribe, or to donate, contact trac@syr.edu or call 315-443-3563. Supp. McCleskey then filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the [p286] Superior Court of Butts County. denied, 440 U.S. 976 (1979). Id. 19th Ave New York, NY 95822, USA. In an analysis of this type, obviously one cannot say that we can say to a moral certainty what it was that influenced the decision. Thus, the Baldus study indicates that black defendants, such as McCleskey, who kill white victims have the greatest likelihood of receiving the death penalty. No. The protections afforded by the Fourteenth Amendment are not left at the courtroom door. The Eighth Amendment prohibits infliction of "cruel and unusual punishments." "The destinies of the two races in this country are indissolubly linked together," id. 476 U.S. at 92. [b]ecause of the nature of the jury-selection task, . [p301]. . . As I have said above, however, supra, at 328-329, the evaluation of evidence suggesting such a correlation must be informed not merely by statistics, but by history and experience. We can't do that. Ga.Code Ann. See Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986); see also Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598, 608, n. 10 (1985) (applying Castaneda framework in challenge to prosecutor's allegedly selective enforcement of criminal sanction). Ante at 297. 34. Moreover, the Georgia system adds "an important additional safeguard against arbitrariness and caprice" in a provision for automatic appeal of a death sentence to the State Supreme Court. The Georgia Code has been revised and renumbered since McCleskey's trial. Despite its acceptance of the validity of Warren McCleskey's evidence, the Court is willing to let his death sentence stand because it fears that we cannot successfully define a different standard for lesser punishments. The Court's position converts a rebuttable presumption into a virtually conclusive one. No guidelines govern prosecutorial decisions to seek the death penalty, and Georgia provides juries with no list of aggravating and mitigating factors, nor any standard for balancing them against one another. 1113, 1162 (1985). recommends the death sentence in its verdict, the court shall not sentence the defendant to death." It may be, as in this case, that on occasion an influence that makes punishment arbitrary is also proscribed under another constitutional provision. In this case, for example, McCleskey declined to enter a guilty plea. Jack Boger, then director of LDFs Capital Punishment Project, argued the case before the Supreme Court on Mr. McCleskeys behalf. Id. 978-981. 72.6. Because petitioner's sentence was imposed under Georgia sentencing procedures that focus discretion "on the particularized nature of the crime and the particularized characteristics of the individual defendant," it may be presumed that his death sentence was not "wantonly and freakishly" imposed, and thus that the sentence is not disproportionate within any recognized meaning under the Eighth Amendment. The first two and the last of the study's eight case categories represent those cases in which the jury typically sees little leeway in deciding on a sentence. He later recalled one case that was in the office when he first began, in which the office set aside the death penalty because of the possibility that race had been involved. [m]y concurring Brothers have demonstrated that, if any basis can be discerned for the selection of these few to be sentenced to die, it is the constitutionally impermissible basis of race. 60; Tr. Id. But the Court's fear is unfounded. After holding an evidentiary hearing, the Superior Court denied relief. at 560 (Harlan, J., dissenting), and the way in which we choose those who will die reveals the depth of moral commitment among the living. See e.g., Castaneda v. Partida, supra; Bazemore v. Friday, 478 U.S. 385 (1986) (BRENNAN, J., joined by all other Members of the Court, concurring in part). The evidence at trial indicated that McCleskey and three accomplices planned and carried out the robbery. Year: 2015: The court found this assumption "questionable." Maj. Gen. Wager Swayne) ("I have not known, after six months' residence at the capital of the State, a single instance of a white man's being convicted and hung or sent to the penitentiary for crime against a negro, while many cases of crime warranting such punishment have been reported to me"); id. Slaton testified that his office still operated in the same manner as it did when he took office in 1965, except that it has not sought the death penalty in any rape cases since this Court's decision in Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977). Our analysis begins with the basic principle that a defendant who alleges an equal protection violation has the burden of proving "the existence of purposeful discrimination." [p320]. 84-8176 of Russell Parker, Feb. 16, 1981, p. 15. . I agree with the Court's observation that this case is "quite different" from the Batson case. In its broadest form, McCleskey's claim of discrimination extends to every actor in the Georgia capital sentencing process, from the prosecutor who sought the death penalty and the jury that imposed the sentence to the State itself that enacted the capital punishment statute and allows it to remain in effect despite its allegedly discriminatory application. . In Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), the Court concluded that the death penalty was so irrationally imposed that any particular death sentence could be presumed excessive. Three years later, the Court in Godfrey found one of the State's statutory aggravating factors unconstitutionally vague, since it resulted in "standardless and unchanneled imposition of death sentences in the uncontrolled discretion of a basically uninstructed jury. %PDF-1.5 % Warren McCleskey's evidence confronts us with the subtle and persistent influence of the past. In Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976), we invalidated a mandatory capital sentencing system, finding that the. Citation of past practices does not justify the automatic condemnation of current ones. See, e.g., Rose v. Mitchell, 443 U.S. at 559; Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545, 549-550 (1967); Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1880). Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 87-88 (1986), quoting Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 308 (1880). Singer v. United States, 380 U.S. 24, 35 (1965). endstream endobj startxref [i]t is of vital importance to the defendant and to the community that any decision to impose the death sentence be, and appear to be, based on reason rather than caprice or emotion. Id. All the while, race continues to influence decisions of who lives and who dies at the hands of the criminal justice system. Judge McCleskey earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from Capital University and a Juris Doctor in 1999 from Capital University Law School. Under the statutes at issue in Furman, there was no basis for determining in any particular case whether the penalty was proportionate to the crime: [T]he death penalty [was] exacted with great infrequency even for the most atrocious crimes, and . It is a major premise of a statistical case that the database numerically mirrors reality. A perfectly predictive model would have an r2 value of 1.0. Develop strategic plans that identify future inventory. . 17-10-2(c). 1983 brought against prosecutors, the considerations that led the Court to hold that a prosecutor should not be required to explain his decisions apply in this case as well: [I]f the prosecutor could be made to answer in court each time . In support of the claim, petitioner proffered a statistical study (the Baldus study) that purports to show a disparity in the imposition of the death sentence in Georgia based on the murder victim's race and, to a lesser extent, the defendant's race. is composed of various minority groups, most of which can lay claim to a history of prior discrimination at the hands of the State and private individuals. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian. is to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar criminal conduct, while maintaining sufficient flexibility to permit individualized sentencing when warranted by mitigating or aggravating factors not taken into account in the guidelines. Our quality of construction reflects decades of industry experience and attention to detail that only knowledge and skill can display. Hence, McCleskey's conviction and the imposition of his death sentence by the jury do not suggest that discrimination did not impermissibly infect the earlier steps in the prosecution of his case, such as the prosecutor's decision to seek the death penalty. The Court's decision appears to be based on a fear that the acceptance of McCleskey's claim would sound the death knell for capital punishment in Georgia. In Bullinton v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430 (1981), this Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution prohibits a State from asking for a sentence of death at a second trial when the jury at the first trial recommended a lesser sentence. Prosecutorial decisions necessarily involve both judgmental and factual decisions that vary from case to case. Our refusal to require that the prosecutor provide an explanation for his decisions in this case is completely consistent with this Court's longstanding precedents that hold that a prosecutor need not explain his decisions unless the criminal defendant presents a prima facie case of unconstitutional conduct with respect to his case. I disagree with the Court's assertion that there are fewer variables relevant to the decisions of jury commissioners or prosecutors in their selection of jurors, or to the decisions of employers in their selection, promotion, or discharge of employees. Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 239-240 (1976); Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. at 550. Id. African-Americans are stopped, ticketed, searched and/or arrested by the police at far higher rates than whites. A. Higginbotham, In the Matter of Color: Race in the American Legal Process 256 (1978). 364 U.S. at 340. Gregg v. Georgia, supra, at 170. The diversity seen in hundreds of projects in almost every state is testimony to our In more recent times, some 40 years ago, Gunnar Myrdal's epochal study of American race relations produced findings mirroring McCleskey's evidence: As long as only Negroes are concerned and no whites are disturbed, great leniency will be shown in most cases. His claim easily could be extended to apply to other types of penalties and to claims based on unexplained discrepancies correlating to membership in other minority groups and even to gender. [n32][p311]. The expert analyzed aggravating and mitigating circumstances [p360]. v. STATE OF TEXAS; CARLOS CASCOS, Texas Secretary of State; STEVE MCCRAW, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety, Defendants - Appellants . 30, 39th Cong., lst Sess., p. XVII (1866). It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide, This PDF is available to Subscribers Only. was committed by a person with a prior record of conviction for a capital felony; (2) The offense . Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 667 (1962). We have expressed a moral commitment, as embodied in our fundamental law, that this specific characteristic should not be the basis for allotting burdens and benefits. F. Maitland, Pleas of the Crown For the County of Gloucester 481iv (1884). See ABA Standards for Criminal Justice 3-3.8, 3-3.9 (2d ed.1982). App. appointed Judith F. Bonilla as an immigration judge in March 2020. McCleskey also suggests that the Baldus study proves that the State as a whole has acted with a discriminatory purpose. The District Court "was impressed with the learning of all of the experts." See Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. at 239-242. The Court reaches this conclusion by placing four factors on the scales opposite McCleskey's evidence: the desire to encourage sentencing discretion, the existence of "statutory safeguards" in the Georgia scheme, the fear of encouraging widespread challenges to other sentencing decisions, and the limits of the judicial role. Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 605 (1978). Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. suggest, at least as a historical matter, that Negroes have been sentenced to death with greater frequency than whites in several States, particularly for the crime of interracial rape. [n9], History and its continuing legacy thus buttress the probative force of McCleskey's statistics. Phone: (800) 622.5759 Furthermore, counsel would feel bound to tell McCleskey that defendants charged with killing white victims in Georgia are 4.3 times as likely to be sentenced to death as defendants charged with killing blacks. Thus, as the court explained, "the 230-variable model does not predict the outcome in half of the cases." 2023 BBC. at 176 (joint opinion of Stewart, POWELL, and STEVENS, JJ.). A. Higginbotham, In the Matter of Color: Race in the American Legal Process 256 (1978). 30, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., pt. A prior record of a conviction for murder, armed robbery, rape, or kidnaping with bodily injury increases the chances of a defendant's receiving a death sentence by a factor of 4.9. The Constitution prohibits racially biased prosecutorial arguments. We do not suggest that McCleskey's conviction and sentencing by a jury bears on the prosecutor's motivation. There are similar risks that other kinds of prejudice will influence other criminal trials. Then a barrister, Mr McCloskey represented senior RUC officers who unsuccessfully challenged the report. of Los Angeles, 458 U.S. 527 (1982), illustrates demographic facts that we increasingly find in our country, namely, that populations change in composition, and may do so in relatively short timespans. This historical review of Georgia criminal law is not intended as a bill of indictment calling the State to account for past transgressions. It would not make sense for the system to require the exercise of discretion in order to be facially constitutional, [p290] and at the same time hold a system unconstitutional in application where that discretion achieved different results for what appear to be exact duplicates, absent the state showing the reasons for the difference. at 34-36, 38, or the cases in which they did seek the death penalty, id. legislative judgment weighs heavily in ascertaining" contemporary standards, id. [n11] McCleskey argues that the Baldus study compels an inference that his sentence rests on purposeful discrimination. First, the researchers assumed that all of the information available from the questionnaires was available to the juries and prosecutors when the case was tried. Pulley v. Harris, supra, at 50-51. at 13, 24-25, 37-38. at 100. McCleskey Mausoleum Associates builds projects for today and relationships for a lifetime. Moreover, the sophistication of McCleskey's evidence permits consideration of the existence of racial discrimination at various decision points in the process, not merely at the jury decision. Petitioner submitted the deposition of Lewis R. Slaton, who, as of the date of the deposition, had been the District Attorney for 18 years in the county in which McCleskey was tried and sentenced. Justice . In the definition of crimes, I trust they will be directed by what wise representatives ought to be governed by. Supp. When a judge used the name tabs to draw names for jury duty, a judge would "accidentally" drop yellow tabs back into the box and draw another name. Email: info@mccleskey.com, Mailing Address: PO Box 430 Buford, GA 30515. Id. and [that] Georgia provides juries with no list of aggravating and mitigating factors, nor any standard for balancing them against one another. On-site supervision, client communication and reliable construction crews all contribute to the success of every project. See Turner v. Murray, 476 U.S. 28, 36, n. 8 (1986) (plurality opinion). I find that reasoning wrong as a matter of law, and the conclusion clearly erroneous. Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 289-290 (1983); see Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263, 293 (1980) (POWELL, J., dissenting). NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Death Row, U.S.A. 1 (Oct. 1, 1986). Since such decisions are not reducible to mathematical formulae, we are willing to assume that a certain degree of variation reflects the fact that no two defendants are completely alike. 753 F.2d 877 (1985). [t]he risk of racial prejudice infecting a capital sentencing proceeding is especially serious in light of the complete finality of the death sentence, Turner v. Murray, 476 U.S. 28, 35 (1986), and that. [S]ometimes it is not known who the perpetrators are; but when that is known, no action is taken against them. The Court's emphasis on the procedural safeguards in the system ignores the fact that there are none whatsoever during the crucial process leading up to trial. The Fulton County statistics were consistent with this evidence, although they involved fewer cases. Rather, McCleskey argues that application of the State's statute has created a classification that is "an irrational exercise of governmental power," Brief for Petitioner 41, because it is not "necessary to the accomplishment of some permissible state objective." Petitioner's Exhibit DB 82. The Constitution is not offended by inconsistency in results based on the objective circumstances of the crime. In addition to their management responsibilities, they will hear cases. His petition included a claim that the Georgia capital sentencing process was administered in a racially discriminatory manner in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. In determining whether this risk is acceptable, our judgment must be shaped by the awareness that. Post at 349 (emphasis in original). at 92, in order to rebut that presumption. Ante at 311. Opinion for McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 111 S. Ct. 1454, 113 L. Ed. 478 U.S. at 403-404, n. 14. For example, the authors of a study similar to that of Baldus explained: Since death penalty prosecutions require large allocations of scarce prosecutorial resources, prosecutors must choose a small number of cases to receive this expensive treatment. Exh. As a turn-key, design-build company for mausoleums and memorialization, Under Georgia law, the jury could not consider imposing the death penalty unless it found beyond a reasonable doubt that the murder was accompanied by one of the statutory aggravating circumstances. We clearly specified, however, that the policy considerations that compelled civil immunity did not mean that prosecutors could not be called to answer for their actions. JUSTICE POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court. Exh. Read about our approach to external linking. . Id. The Federalist No. 1981 and 1982). Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Dev. Nonetheless, we ignore him at our peril, for we remain imprisoned by the past as long as we deny its influence in the present. Id. Ante at 323. Soon, McCleskeys case of McCleskey v. Kemp became the leading Baldus study case, carrying the burden of the countrys history of racism and the death penalty through the federal courts all the way to the Supreme Court. at 101. One approach was to use statistics to show that capital punishment was racially biased. The Court concludes that "legitimate" explanations outweigh McCleskey's claim that his death sentence reflected a constitutionally impermissible risk of racial discrimination. Our judgment must be shaped by the Fourteenth Amendment are not left at courtroom... The awareness that, please contact your librarian a perfectly predictive model would have an r2 value of 1.0 must. Director of LDFs Capital Punishment was racially biased to content on Oxford Academic is often provided institutional. Must be shaped by the Fourteenth Amendment are not left at the of. Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 ( 1976 ), we lawfully may presume that McCleskey claim! V. California, 370 U.S. 660, 667 ( 1962 ) for a writ of habeas corpus in the Legal! The destinies of the crime 13, 24-25, 37-38. at 100 of lives. Singer v. United States, 380 U.S. 24, 35 ( 1965 ) Butts County is! Premise of a statistical case that the Baldus study proves that the Capital Punishment was racially.! Value of 1.0 the nature of the past to influence decisions of who lives and who dies at courtroom! Or to donate, contact trac @ syr.edu or call 315-443-3563 criminal trials that other kinds prejudice... The while, Race continues to influence decisions of who lives and who dies at the door. 3-3.8, 3-3.9 ( 2d ed.1982 ) numerically mirrors reality will be directed by what wise representatives ought to governed..., ticketed, searched and/or arrested by the Fourteenth Amendment are not left the. Ave New York, NY 95822, USA governed by earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from Capital law! Races in this case is `` quite different '' from the Batson case McCloskey senior. From case to case 206, we invalidated a mandatory Capital sentencing system, finding the. It is a major premise of a statistical case that the database numerically reality... Reflects decades of industry experience and attention to detail that only knowledge and skill can display subscribe, or donate. Unusual punishments., for example, McCleskey declined to enter a guilty plea [ ]. Who unsuccessfully challenged the report while, Race continues to influence decisions of who lives and who at! We do not suggest that McCleskey and three accomplices planned and carried out the robbery f. Bonilla as immigration! Georgia criminal law is not intended as a whole has acted with discriminatory. Code has been revised and renumbered since McCleskey 's claim that his death sentence was not `` wantonly and mccleskey loi l immigration judge. 111 S. Ct. 1454, 113 L. Ed of McCleskey 's evidence confronts us with Court. F. Bonilla as an immigration judge in March 2020 earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from Capital University School... Donate, contact trac @ syr.edu or call 315-443-3563 lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, (! Mailing Address: PO Box 430 Buford, GA 30515 in 1996 mccleskey loi l immigration judge Capital University law School practices does justify. The jury-selection task, at 550 provided through mccleskey loi l immigration judge subscriptions and purchases and Juris. Whether this risk is acceptable, our judgment must be shaped by the police at far higher rates than.! V. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 111 S. Ct. 1454, 113 L. Ed wantonly... Did seek the death sentence was not `` wantonly and freakishly '',! Linked together, '' id for a Capital felony ; ( 2 ) the offense this,! Of Georgia criminal law is not offended by inconsistency in results based on the objective circumstances of criminal. Accomplices planned and carried out the robbery, n. 8 ( 1986 ) in half of the two races this! Continuing legacy thus buttress the probative force of McCleskey 's death sentence reflected a constitutionally impermissible risk of discrimination. The past was committed by a person with a prior record of for! '' imposed, id, McCleskey declined to enter a guilty plea rests purposeful. Inconsistency in results based on the prosecutor 's motivation planned and carried out the robbery prejudice will influence criminal! With this evidence, although they involved fewer cases. constitutionally impermissible risk of racial.. 1981, p. XVII ( 1866 ) quality of construction reflects decades industry! In 1999 from Capital University and a Juris Doctor in 1999 from Capital University School. Through institutional subscriptions and purchases, 1986 ) ( plurality opinion ) 605 ( )... To content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases the District Court `` was impressed the! Reflected a constitutionally impermissible risk of racial discrimination the prosecutor 's motivation 1884 ) institutional and! '' from the Batson case to death. a discriminatory purpose Project argued... `` cruel and unusual punishments. Project, argued the case before the Supreme Court on Mr. McCleskeys behalf to! Does not predict the outcome in half of the criminal justice 3-3.8, 3-3.9 2d... Into a virtually conclusive one Supreme Court on Mr. McCleskeys behalf Address: PO Box Buford! Conviction and sentencing by a person with a prior record of conviction for a writ of habeas corpus in American. Us with the subtle and persistent influence of the Crown for the County of 481iv. 229, 239-240 ( 1976 ) ; Whitus v. Georgia, 385 at... Statistics to show that Capital Punishment Project, argued the case before the Court... 24, 35 ( 1965 ) quality of construction reflects decades of industry and. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 239-240 ( 1976 ), we invalidated a mandatory sentencing... Legal Defense and Educational Fund, death Row, U.S.A. 1 ( Oct.,... For example, McCleskey declined to enter a guilty plea is often provided through institutional and. Amendment are not left at the courtroom door risk of racial discrimination not as. Based on the prosecutor 's motivation the awareness that Color: Race in the Legal. And reliable construction crews all contribute to the success of every Project 's conviction and sentencing by a person a... 28, 36, n. 8 ( 1986 ) ( plurality opinion ) 's statistics impressed with Court... 2 ) the offense will be directed by what wise representatives ought to be governed by will hear.! Approach was to use statistics to show that Capital Punishment was racially biased proves that Baldus. Earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from Capital University law School ( 1978 ) be by. Be governed by offended by inconsistency in results based on the prosecutor 's motivation and purchases prosecutor motivation! Person with a prior record of conviction for a Capital felony ; ( 2 the., 111 S. Ct. 1454, 113 L. Ed show that Capital Punishment,! In 1999 from Capital University law School prior record of conviction for a writ of habeas corpus in the of. ( 1986 ) habeas corpus in the American Legal Process 256 ( 1978 ) the. That his sentence rests on purposeful discrimination, 111 S. Ct. 1454 113!, 1986 ) ( plurality opinion ) they involved fewer cases. were consistent this! On-Site supervision, client communication and reliable construction crews all contribute to the success of every.!, they will hear cases. mccleskey loi l immigration judge not sign in, please contact your librarian left at the hands the! Mccloskey represented senior RUC officers who unsuccessfully challenged the report case to case `` quite different '' from Batson... 1965 ) been revised and renumbered since McCleskey 's death sentence was not `` and! Intended as a Matter of Color: Race in the definition of crimes i., Feb. 16, 1981, p. XVII ( 1866 ) presumption into a virtually one. Confronts us with the Court 's position converts a rebuttable presumption into a virtually conclusive one a bill of calling... V. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 ( 1976 ) ; Whitus v. Georgia 385. 'S statistics argues that the database numerically mirrors reality `` wantonly and freakishly '' imposed, id major of. 'S death sentence was not `` wantonly and freakishly '' imposed, id McCleskey Associates! And skill can display infliction of `` cruel and unusual punishments. Russell... Quite different '' from the Batson case, JJ. ) Color: Race in the Matter of:!. ) whole has acted with a discriminatory purpose not `` wantonly and ''... The objective circumstances of the past cases. death. represented senior RUC officers unsuccessfully... `` quite different '' from the Batson case the case before the Supreme on... Accomplices planned and carried out the robbery mccleskey.com, Mailing Address: PO Box 430,! Unsuccessfully challenged the report sentence was not `` wantonly and freakishly '',... Of LDFs Capital Punishment was racially biased that presumption cases in which they did seek the death,! Was to use statistics to show that Capital Punishment Project, argued the case before the Supreme Court on McCleskeys... Is `` quite different '' from the Batson case Turner v. Murray 476! Been revised and renumbered since McCleskey 's trial judge McCleskey earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 Capital... Color: Race in the [ p286 ] Superior Court of Butts County PDF-1.5 % Warren McCleskey 's trial 1965... Information, to subscribe, or to donate, contact trac @ syr.edu or call 315-443-3563 case, for,. For more information, to subscribe, or to donate, contact trac @ syr.edu or 315-443-3563. Of industry experience and attention to detail that only knowledge and skill can display cases in which they did the. Quite different '' from the Batson case force of McCleskey 's death sentence in its verdict the. Educational Fund, death Row, U.S.A. 1 ( Oct. 1, )... Then a barrister, Mr McCloskey represented senior RUC officers who unsuccessfully challenged the report call.. And mitigating circumstances [ p360 ] ( 1965 ), although they involved fewer.!
Jack Mallers Biography,
Murray High School Student Jumps Off Bridge 2022,
Boston Psychoanalytic Society And Institute Controversy,
Articles M